On Processes and Results

post from Beyond the Box Score - All Posts on 18 October 2012 07:02:22 PM. © Beyond the Box Score - All Posts

20120811_ajw_aj5_136

For the sake of clarity, I’m going to paint an extreme hypothetical scenario here. Say that a given team has two outs in the ninth inning of a game. They’re down by one run, with runners on second and third. There’s a right-handed pitcher on the mound. One of the pinch-hit options is the right-handed Ryan Braun. The other is the switch-hitting Emmanuel Burriss. With the game on the line, the manager decides to insert Burriss as the pinch hitter because of the platoon advantage. Braun is the superior hitter, even against right-handed pitchers, and it’s not even close. No manager in his right mind would ever actually do this, but again, this is merely hypothetical.

Now, let’s say Burriss comes through in the situation with a game-winning two-run single. I said this was an extreme example, and crazy as it sounds, it’s within the realm of possibility that Burriss could collect a game-winning hit. Would that justify the decision to use him as a pinch hitter? Of course not. Regardless of the results, the process was stupid. After the game, we’d all say that the team won in spite of the manager, not because of him.
The focus, in analysis, tends to be on process. As it should be. Results are secondary. This is how we go about judging lots of things in baseball -- managerial decisions, transactions led by a front office, etc.

Here’s another situation, only this one isn’t hypothetical: in January, the Tampa Bay Rays signed Fernando Rodney to a one-year contract (with a club option for 2013) worth $2M in guaranteed cash. The collective reaction, on Twitter and whatnot -- at the risk of generalizing -- was one of derision. Rodney was set to turn 35 years old in March. He was coming off a season in which his walk rate had actually been higher than his strikeout rate. He hadn’t posted a sub-4.00 FIP since 2007, and he hadn’t posted a sub-4.00 ERA since 2006. Not once, in his ten-year career, had he maintained an above-average walk rate. Two million dollars isn’t exactly a lot of money, but it seemed awfully optimistic of the Rays to expect Rodney to be a competent late-inning reliever.

Yeah, it seemed that way. Then he went on to post the lowest ERA (0.61) by any pitcher who had ever thrown 50-plus innings in a single season. He had his fair share of help from the Rays’ defense -- particularly expert pitch-framer Jose Molina -- and his FIP was roughly 1.5 runs higher, but Rodney was spectacular nonetheless. He was so good, in fact, that his ERA+ of 634 was higher than the sum of his individual ERA+ marks from each of the previous six seasons.

Did the Rays know what they were doing when they tossed chump change in Rodney’s direction? Surely they didn’t expect historic numbers like this. But there’s a hint that the Rays had something specific in mind when they signed Rodney. They shifted Rodney’s position on the rubber, which altered his release points. And the results were phenomenal.

I didn’t think much of the deal at the time, but wouldn’t it be silly to look back on it and say it was a foolish signing, in light of the results? The process didn’t look good, necessarily, but here’s the thing -- we didn’t really have a firm grasp of the process. We still don’t. But we know that the Rays had Rodney make some adjustments right from the start, and we know that these adjustments paid off. The results give us some inkling of an idea what Tampa Bay was thinking when they signed Rodney.

This tendency to focus on the process, to analyze based solely on statistical projections and the like -- because that’s the data available to us, obscures the fact that we know very little. There was something similar discussed on the Baseball Prospectus Up & In Podcast a while ago that resonated with me. Thankfully, it was transcribed by mightyflynn on Tumblr:

PP: They’re dealing with metrics that people in the public sphere don’t have access to and can’t—and aren’t writing about. It’s a completely different story.
KG: And would kill to see.
PP: Right. They are dealing with different information.
KG: Yeah, they have data people would love to have public. They have all sorts of stuff, they’re doing amazing stuff with it. They’re doing fantastic, ridiculous stuff that we would love to have public and it would be awesome. And, you know, we’ll continue to try to catch up to em, but they have certain advantages on data and people, and they’re doing some ridiculously cool stuff that no one talks about because it’s all private to the club, for good reason. It’s part of their perceived competitive advantage.

There’s a wealth of data out there -- on Fangraphs, Baseball Reference, et al. -- and I’d hate to understate its value. The scope of information freely available to the public is astounding. But it pales in comparison to what front offices have. They have a much broader understanding of all of this, whether through scouting or field f/x technologies or other various sources. And we'd be arrogant and ignorant to think otherwise.

We owe it to ourselves to realize and recognize just how little we know. This means giving teams the benefit of the doubt. This means approaching analyses with a level of calculated uncertainty. And this means keeping an open mind. We can’t dismiss results. We have to weigh them, examine them, and seek to learn something from them; there is, after all, a lot to be learned from them.

Read The Full Article:
http://www.beyondtheboxscore.com/2012/10/18/3522222/on-processes-and-results

Digg this

DODGERS HIRE HUNSICKER

post from LADodgerTalk.com - Matt Kemp, Clayton Kershaw, Vin Scully, Andre Ethier and the Dodgers on 18 October 2012 07:01:46 PM. © LADodgerTalk.com - Matt Kemp, Clayton Kershaw, Vin Scully, Andre Ethier and the Dodgers

Read The Full Article:
http://www.ladodgertalk.com/2012/10/dodgers-hire-hunsicker/

Digg this

Reggie Jackson 2011 Topps Tier One Game-Used
Jersey Card

post from 30-Year Old Cardboard on 18 October 2012 06:12:51 PM. © 30-Year Old Cardboard

Reggie Jackson 2011 Topps Tier One Game-Used Jersey Card This card could easily be the best looking relic card in my Reggie Jackson collection. Heck, it could be the best looking relic card in my entire collection. Topps’ Tier One … Continue reading →

Read The Full Article:
http://bapple2286.wordpress.com/2012/10/18/reggie-jackson-2011-topps-tier-one-gam
e-used-jersey-card/

Digg this

Diamondbacks hire Brenly as TV analyst (Yahoo!
Sports)

post from MLB News Blog on 18 October 2012 06:09:09 PM. © MLB News Blog

PHOENIX (AP) — Former Arizona manager Bob Brenly rejoined the Diamondbacks as a television analyst Thursday, a day after he left the Chicago Cubs’ broadcast crew.

Read The Full Article:
http://www.mlbnewsblog.com/2012/10/18/diamondbacks-hire-brenly-as-tv-analyst-yaho
o-sports/

Digg this

Angels Pujols has minor surgery on right knee
(Yahoo! Sports)

post from MLB News Blog on 18 October 2012 06:07:03 PM. © MLB News Blog

ANAHEIM, Calif. (AP) — Albert Pujols had arthroscopic surgery on his right knee last week, and the Los Angeles Angels first baseman should be ready for the start of spring training.

Read The Full Article:
http://www.mlbnewsblog.com/2012/10/18/angels-pujols-has-minor-surgery-on-right-kn
ee-yahoo-sports/

Digg this

Beltran not in Cardinals lineup for NLCS Game 4
(Yahoo! Sports)

post from MLB News Blog on 18 October 2012 05:13:28 PM. © MLB News Blog

ST. LOUIS (AP) — Carlos Beltran is not in the St. Louis Cardinals’ starting lineup for Game 4 of the NL championship series against the San Francisco Giants, a day after injuring his left knee while running on a double-play grounder.

Read The Full Article:
http://www.mlbnewsblog.com/2012/10/18/beltran-not-in-cardinals-lineup-for-nlcs-ga
me-4-yahoo-sports/

Digg this

OT: What's your favorite sports video game

post from Beyond the Box Score - All Posts on 18 October 2012 05:02:18 PM. © Beyond the Box Score - All Posts

Gyi0062193352

Face it, for most kids from the 90's and 00's, video games were a constant presence. And chances are, if you were into sports, you were also into sports video games.

For me, the first sports video game I really, really obsessed over was the classic NHL '94 (which I had for the Sega Genesis). I was never a big Genesis kid growing up, but living in New Jersey, I caught Devils fever after going to a game or two, and the video game just reeled me in.

NHL '94 had everything you look for in a sports video game, a robust season, the ability to adjust rosters and, best of all, serious replayability. Sure, you could spam one-timers to crush your opposition, and see if you could rack up a dozen goals against the Hartford Whalers, but my trick of choice was taking a speedy wing and curling them back around the goal, before dumping the puck into the corner of the net. While my favorite player was Devils wing Stephane Richer (classic!), I couldn't help but adopt the Buffalo Sabres and lightning-fast winger Alexander Mogilny for play against my friends. The front line pair of Pat LaFontaine and Mogilny was absolutely devastating! (Plus, that team had a benchwarming Dominik Hasek! He was only a 53!)

A couple other favorite games were the original and Super versions of Baseball Simulator 1.000. SBS1K allowed you to give your players special abilities like laser line-drives that carried players back into the wall when they got in front of them, or pitches that floated like leaves to the batter. Also, I was a sucker for one of my first SNES games: Bill Laimbeer's Combat Basketball. That game wasn't actually any good, but it was weird enough (and replayed enough) to stick in my head for ages.

So what's been your favorite sports video game? Let us know in the comments below!

Welcome to the Beyond the Box Score Community Group. This article and others like it are expressly off-topic in our continuing effort to get to know each other, and to get to know you. This is purely for fun, and if you don't like it, tell us about it! We'll be doing these once a day or so. Jump right in and tell us what you think.